Registrant A

Profession: Practitioner psychologist

Registration Number: PYLXXXXX

Hearing Type: Final Hearing

Date and Time of hearing: 10:00 04/11/2024 End: 17:00 28/11/2024

Location: Best Western Plus Bentley Hotel & Spa (Newark Road, South Hykeham, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, LN6 9NH)

Panel: Conduct and Competence Committee
Outcome: Caution

Please note that the decision can take up to 5 working days to be uploaded onto the HCPTS website. Please contact one of our Hearings Team Managers via tsteam@hcpts-uk.org or +44 (0)808 164 3084 if you require any further information.

 

Allegation

Whilst registered as a Practitioner Psychologist (PYLXXXXX), between August 2010 and 2015, you:
1. Did not maintain appropriate professional boundaries, in that you:
a) In or around January 2013 you offered and/or allowed Person B to offer for M and her children to live with you at your family home;
b) In or around April 2014 you offered and then allowed M and her children to move into your family home for an unknown period of time;
c) did not retain a professional position in your communication with M, as set out in Schedule A;
d) did not set appropriate boundaries and/or withdraw from the therapeutic relationship with M, after M expressed feelings of love and/or sexual desire towards you;
e) used disrespectful and/or unprofessional language when referring to F2, not in keeping with the expectation of a professional relationship, as set out in Schedule B;
f) hugged M on multiple occasions between 2012 to 2014, without clinical justification, as set out in Schedule C;

2. After considering the possibility that M may have Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) and/or after F2 suggested M may have DID, you:
a) acted beyond your area of competency by continuing to treat M;
b) did not seek the input of a multidisciplinary team with connections into other statutory services and/or make the appropriate referrals to specialist services, including suicide prevention services;
c) did not seek further regular supervision with someone experienced with DID.
d) HCPC Offered No Evidence

3. Did not adequately safeguard W, X, Y and Z, in that you:
a) HCPC Offered no Evidence
b) did not make a child protection referral to Social Services and/or seek advice on making such a referral with respect to W, X, Y and Z.
c) HCPC Offered No Evidence

4. After diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in relation to members of Family A, you did not;
a) seek third party information from other relevant sources to confirm the diagnosis such as:
i) relevant case history;
ii) medical history;
iii) speech and language assessments.
b) Make a referral to local NHS teams in respect of their special needs and educational placements to follow up and support the diagnosis.

5. At a section 47 strategy meeting held on 5 September 2013, you:
a) did not disclose your opinion that M suffered from DID;
b) HCPC Offered No Evidence

6. On 2 July 2014, during a conversation with SW1, made unprofessional comments about SW2 in that you said:
a) “SW2 is M’s next abuser as he continues with the abusive dynamics” or words to that effect;
b) “SW2 is gathering evidence against me” or words to that effect.

7. The matters described at particulars 1-6 amount to misconduct.

8. By reason of your misconduct your fitness to practise is impaired.

Finding

Preliminary Matters
Application to proceed in private
1. The Panel acknowledged that there is a strong public interest in ensuring that hearings are conducted in public to ensure transparency. However, the Panel accepted the submissions made by Ms Steels, and supported by Mr Saad, and decided that the whole of the hearing should be held in private. In reaching this decision the Panel had regard to the protection of the private lives of M and her children and the Registrant’s health. The Panel took into account from the evidence in the bundle that the private life of M and her children is inextricably linked to the Allegation. The Panel concluded it would not be feasible to conduct only part of the hearing in private and therefore determined to hold the whole hearing in private. A decision to hold the hearing in private would also provide protection in relation to the Registrant’s health matters.

Order

The Registrar is directed to annotate the Register entry of Registrant A with a caution which is to remain on the Register for a period of 1 year from the date this Order comes into effect.

Notes

Right of Appeal
You may appeal to the High Court in England and Wales against the Panel’s decision and the order it has made against you.

Under Article 29(10) of the Health Professions Order 2001, any appeal must be made within 28 days of the date when this notice is served on you. The Panel’s order will not take effect until the appeal period has expired or, if you appeal, until that appeal is disposed of or withdrawn.

Hearing History

History of Hearings for Registrant A

Date Panel Hearing type Outcomes / Status
04/11/2024 Conduct and Competence Committee Final Hearing Caution
;